Ah, are you saying the binding isn't taking place at the top level because I had to call 'bar' to get the right hand side (so to speak) of the binding?
And if 'bar' were a macro instead, then it would be expanded first and then nothing would have to be evaluated before binding to 'foo', and so it would be at the top level? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
