Hi, Peter Taoussanis was kind enough to contribute truss implementation to validation-benchmark.
I have run it (with a few <https://github.com/muhuk/validation-benchmark/commit/7f501a5af769baca4c2fefe5733222a02ff77d7c> upgrades <https://github.com/muhuk/validation-benchmark/commit/68a75036efd28b5eb665406dd99690241eae48d3> to <https://github.com/muhuk/validation-benchmark/commit/edda54ed567c22aadd54d5b0e58b697b8be4c432> other <https://github.com/muhuk/validation-benchmark/commit/1f3b9c5034e5c654414b0d24ac5a60de9e3d4d30> dependencies) and updated the report page. ----- Personal note: truss is faster than anything else. Much faster. How can this be? It can't be an issue of no-op. Because the wrapper (validation-benchmark.lib.truss/wrapper) is calling the given function. And validation-benchmark.core/prepare-benchmark-for-lib wraps the benchmark function with an assertion on the result (true for valid, false for invalid). Either we have a bug or I am justified to be in awe. -- Kind Regards, Atamert Ölçgen ◻◼◻ ◻◻◼ ◼◼◼ www.muhuk.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
