>From https://clojure.org/guides/spec#_collections: *One important aspect of coll-of and map-of is that they both sample their inputs, checking only a subset of the values for performance reasons. Due to this, conform of these specs does not flow conformed values (because they are not all conformed).*
>From playing around a bit and reading the sources I came to the conclusion that the above means that values are indeed returned by conform but those values (specifically, from the sources, after the first 100 values) do not necessarily conform to the predicates, is that the correct way to read the above? Are there any plans of implementing a more statistical approach in the future in order to increase the chance of finding bugs? Is it a bad idea to bind *coll-check-limit* to infinity in a local thread binding for more thorough possibly time and CPU consuming testing of a specific function? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
