I think the tradition is more general: abstract process which need missing process passed in(seems all high order functions under this category) should have missing process comes first as it's parameter. This tradition not only limited to sequence parameter.
在 2008年4月17日星期四 UTC+8下午10:07:21，Rich Hickey写道： > > > > and one way to think about many of the seq functions is that they are > parameterized in some way: > > (map f)<-(filter pred)<-[1 2 3 4] > > So, sequence functions take their source(s) last, and any other > parameters before them, and partial allows for direct parameterization > as above. There is a tradition of this in functional languages and > Lisps. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
