On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Erik Assum <e...@assum.net> wrote:
> Not being good at reading other peoples mind, I’ll give my guess as to what
> Timothy was trying to suggest:
>
> If you define your input as a map with keys such as:
>
> {:type :switched ; can be :switched :dual or :something
> :pos 54}
>
> You can make something like:
>
> (defmulti verify-pos-for :type)
Yes, a multi-method could be used here, but Timothy suggested the data
model might be wrong and that's what I was interested in. I think I'm
already setup to do the multi-methods with the current data model,
though it feels like a heavy-weight answer to the problem.
Thanks for the suggestion though!
-John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
