Looks like it is, in the meanwhile this patch should fix it: http://sprunge.us/XTiA
> On 23 May 2016, at 23:03, Nicola Mometto <brobro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Possibly CLJ-1544 related? > >> On 23 May 2016, at 22:59, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant >> <abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I'm having trouble calling `s/gen`, might be some sort of AOT compilation >> error. >> (I'm guessing this line has something to do with it). >> >> I'm using the latest master-SNAPSHOT. >> >> (ns gen-load.core >> (:require [clojure.spec :as s])) >> >> (s/gen integer?) >> ;CompilerException java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: >> clojure/spec/gen$gen_for_pred, compiling:(gen_load/core.clj:4:1) >> >> Thanks, >> Ambrose >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant >> <abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I see, thanks. >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Rich Hickey <richhic...@gmail.com> wrote: >> fdef will not add doc metadata (see rationale re: not putting more stuff in >> the namespaces/vars), but specs will be present when you call ‘doc’. That >> doc enhancement was in a push later in the afternoon. >> >> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/commit/4c8efbc42efa22ec1d08a1e9fa5dd25db99766a9 >> >>> On May 23, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant >>> <abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Rich+team, this is awesome. >>> >>> Instrumented vars via `fdef` do not seem to add :doc metadata yet >>> (which is advertised in the docstring for `fdef`). >>> >>> Am I missing something? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ambrose >>> >>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Andrey Grin <andrey.g...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Thank you. Yes, it seems that for recursion I can use the same approach. As >>> for inheritance currently I just include all parent attributes in every >>> child schema. As for spec definition multi-spec, as I understand it, >>> requires "defmethod" for every class which is probably a problem for my >>> case since all inheritance hierarchies are also determined at run-time. I >>> will need to find some approach that is both dynamic and supports precise >>> error messages in case validation fails. >>> >>> >>> Am Montag, 23. Mai 2016 22:38:24 UTC+2 schrieb Alex Miller: >>> I think you could apply the same idea - use a regular translation between >>> Java class and registered name and then always refer to the registered name. >>> >>> There are probably multiple approaches to modeling inheritance, so hard to >>> recommend something without knowing more. In general, attributes coming >>> from super classes can be modeled using the parent attribute name. And I >>> would recommend looking into multi-spec for doing validation of a number of >>> "types" that could be flowing into the same location by leveraging a >>> multimethod that conditionally provides the spec to use. >>> >>> On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 3:09:46 PM UTC-5, Andrey Grin wrote: >>> Thanks, Alex. I've taken random example from plumatic.schema wiki to >>> quickly illustrate the question. In my actual use case I dynamically >>> generate schemas based on hundreds of model Java classes (beans) with >>> mutual references so I need recursion (and also some way to model >>> inheritance, that was is achieved with "conditional" in plumatic). Will try >>> to implement the same with spec. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail