The only conclusion I can draw from these benchmarks over the years is that the speed of Clojure is inversely proportional to it's idiomaticity
On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 7:23:48 AM UTC+2, Mars0i wrote: > > On Tuesday, April 26, 2016 at 12:19:23 AM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: >> >> I was going to say that I'd be surprised if Clojure were as fast as SBCL >> (overall, on average, depends on your application, depends on how you code >> it, ymmv, etc. ...). Then I stopped back to check the little benchmarks on >> the Computer Language Benchmarks Game >> <https://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/compare.php?lang=clojure&lang2=sbcl> >> >> . Whatever it is that those comparisons do, or don't prove, I would no >> longer be surprised. >> > > I forgot how much faster Clojure got in 1.7 and 1.8. I remember Java > wiping the floor with Clojure on most of those benchmarks a couple of years > ago, but now it's just a little bit faster on average > <https://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u64q/clojure.html> on those > benchmarks. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
