I've been implementing custom persistent map and its transient counterpart <https://github.com/JvJ/cross-map/blob/master/src/cross_map/core.cljc> *(currently incomplete, but it won't be for long).* I would like to test how they perform compared to the default PersistentMap and TransientMap implementations.
So far, to do this, I've been using a benchmarking library called Criterium <https://github.com/hugoduncan/criterium>. Criterium is great, but it has one major disadvantage as far as my project is concerned: It's JVM-specific, where as my project is cross-platform JVM and JS. What I want to know is this: Will the JVM benchmarking numbers reflect how the JS implementation performs? I understand that JVM and JS are different platforms with different capabilities, and that in general JS is slower than JVM. What I really want to know is whether or not the ratios will hold up. For instance: If running a set of operations my custom map takes on average 2.5 times longer than the same set of operations on a normal PersistentHashMap, will that "2.5 times" figure still approximately hold up across platforms? Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
