I wasn't trying to solve any particular problem.  I was just wondering 
about the possibility of it.

The main motivation would be performance gains.

On Monday, 25 April 2016 12:55:20 UTC-7, Dan Girellini wrote:
>
> Not knowing the problem you’re specifically trying to solve, would using 
> using the GNU java compiler work to take byte code to native?
>
>
> On April 25, 2016 at 12:47:37 PM, JvJ (kfjwh...@gmail.com <javascript:>) 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> I've been wondering lately about getting Clojure to compile to native 
> code, and so I've been doing some looking around.
>
> There are a few projects that are on the right track, such as TinyClojure 
> <https://github.com/WillDetlor/TinyClojure> and Ferret 
> <http://nakkaya.com/2011/06/29/ferret-an-experimental-clojure-compiler/>, 
> but they are incomplete and don't seem to be under active development any 
> more.
>
> I'm wondering about the requirements, how much work it would take, and 
> whether or not it would be worth it.  My current thinking is of a 
> Clojure->C/C++ compiler.
>
> So far, I have a few topics for discussion that I'm unclear about that 
> might be necessary for this kind of project:
>
>    - Can the Immutable Persistent Data Structures be implemented with a 
>    reference-counting scheme rather than a garbage collector?  This may 
>    improve performance. 
>    - In a similar vein, can the allocation strategy be controlled for 
>    these structures in such a way as to optimize cache locality? 
>    - Can we take advantage of tail-call optimization in existing C++ 
>    compilers? 
>    - It wouldn't have to depend on an existing runtime environment like 
>    JVM or JavaScript. 
>    - 
>       - Could this reduce reliance on reflection and increase performance? 
>       - Could a new, clojure-optimized runtime be created that improves 
>       performance? 
>    - Could certain anonymous functions be optimized or inlined in a way 
>    that improves performance over JVM/JS implementations? 
>    - Is there a way to compile C++ code at runtime?  This would be 
>    essential for the REPL and for Macros. 
>
>
> Let me know if anyone has any thoughts on the matter.
>
> Thanks
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to