On 4/13/16, 11:50 AM, "clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of 
676c7...@gmail.com" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of 676c7...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
>Would now be a good moment to bump the major version number to indicate
>clearly to all clients ‘your software may break if you make the jump’?

It jumped from 0.5.x to 0.6.0 — that’s usually how contrib libraries indicate 
potential breakage.

Contrib libraries have a strict set of criteria to reach 1.0.0 and, last I 
asked the Clojure/core folks, very few of the contrib libraries are ready for 
that yet.

If you look at the java.jdbc change log you’ll see:

0.0.7 -> 0.1.0 — removed dependency on structmap, potentially breaking 
order-dependent code
0.1.4 -> 0.2.0 — merged namespaces, potentially breaking code that depended on 
the "internal" namespace
0.2.3 -> 0.3.0 — deprecated 0.2.x API (moved it to a different namespace, 
breaking code), introduced new API
0.3.7 -> 0.4.0 — dropped Clojure 1.2 support
0.4.2 -> 0.5.0 — dropped Clojure 1.3 support
0.5.0 -> 0.5.5 — deprecated variadic aspects of the API
0.5.8 -> 0.6.0 — removed deprecated features

Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to