On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> But we should mention that recursive data structures that contain refs are
> a bit of a code-smell. Your structures are no longer immutable if they
> contain refs which are mutable containers for immutable data. Something to
> think about.
>

I understand, but this library is all about state because it is about
modelling long-lived entities over time as an unpredictable stream of
events act on the model.

One good use case was a virtual RoboCup soccer team fed sensory data every
100ms and responding with actions such as turning, moving, and kicking.

So we have a long-lived soccer player instance who observes the world,
forms a strategy consisting of so many tactics and emits actions based on
the current tactic. New information comes in and the tactic itself has a
condition that says when it has succeeded or should be abandoned. etc etc.

This is modeled with a player instance (or "model") and slots for strategy
etc, each of which is a ruled cell working off the sensory data. These
Cells depend on each other and notify their dependents when they change.
Here comes the cycle: a Cell knows the model and slot-name it is mediating,
so it is self sufficient: if someone tells me to recompute, I can do so
without also being told the instance. I can then also invoke any observers,
which are dispatched by slot name.

Well, this much I can change: when someone asks for my value I just need to
record two pieces of information, the model and slot-name.

Of course my next problem is that no model is an island: they exist in
trees where each node knows its parent (whassat? a DAG?). Hello cycle.
Well, I guess just recording the model did that. Anyway, the solution that
springs to mind is keeping one big dictionary keyed off a serial integer.

Thank god for 64-bits. :)

Thx, kt






> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:53 AM, James Reeves <ja...@booleanknot.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 31 March 2016 at 16:39, hiskennyness <kentil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> In porting my modelling library Cells to Clojure I managed to get a
>>> stack overflow when the printer tried to print a recursive data structure*
>>> I have used in the Common Lisp version.
>>>
>>> * Basically, a ref holds a map in which some values are maps in which
>>> some values are the ref.
>>>
>>> In Lisp we have *print-depth* as well as *print-length* to deal with
>>> just this case.
>>>
>>> Is there some way I can deal with this, or are recursive data structures
>>> not really supported by Clojure?
>>>
>>
>> The same variables exist in Clojure: *print-level* and *print-length*
>> respectively.
>>
>> - James
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking
> zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
> programs.”
> (Robert Firth)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/TGtavJVzVWk/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
Kenneth Tilton
Founder/Developer
TiltonTec
54 Isle of Venice Dr
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301

k...@tiltontec.com
http://tiltontec.com
@tiltonsalgebra

646-269-1077

"In a class by itself." *-Macworld*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to