In the latest round of Techempower benchmarks:
https://www.techempower.com/benchmarks/#section=data-r12&hw=peak&test=json
... I was surprised to find Luminus performing no better than Hapi
(Node) and significantly worse than Java frameworks. Figures are
requests/second:
FORTUNES
- Hapi: 1.9
- Luminus: 0.9
- Gemini: 55.5
JSON SERIALISATION
- Hapi: 0.3 (Raw db)
- Luminus: 0.8
- Rapidoid: 78.4
SINGLE QUERY
- Hapi: 2.9
- Luminus: 8.7
- Gemini: 75.8
MULTI-QUERY
- Hapi: 33.0
- Luminus: 20.4
- Dropwizard: 65.8
DATA UPDATES
- Hapi: 20.9
- Luminus: 20.0
- Ninja: 54.7
PLAINTEXT
- Hapi: 0.7
- Luminus: 0.0
- Rapidoid: 100.0
Any ideas?
gvim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
