You're going to be a great maintainer, Paul.

On Monday, February 15, 2016 at 5:30:04 PM UTC-5, Paul L. Snyder wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Gregg Reynolds wrote: 
>
> > On Feb 11, 2016 6:19 AM, "Aysylu Greenberg" <ays...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > > 
> > > I'm pleased to announce that Paul Snyder 
> > (@pataprogramming, pataprogramming on Github) has joined me in 
> maintaining 
> > Loom. I'm excited for the coming year for Loom, with more excellent 
> > contributions accepted faster. 
> > 
> > Your Readme doesn't even bother to say what loom is. 
>
> Hi, Gregg, 
>
> Thanks for pointing out an area where additional clarification would be 
> helpful to potential users of Loom. 
>
> Who is the 'you' that this criticism is intended to address? Aysylu, who's 
> been serving as maintainer for this library over the last years? Justin, 
> who originally created it? The over two dozen contributors who have helped 
> build its functionality? Suggesting that they didn't "even bother" with 
> something is, frankly, rude and unproductive. 
>
> I'm happy we don't see much of this sort of casual disrespect in the 
> Clojure community (with the exception of occasional bad actors on the 
> mailing list). The worst of what we do see is, largely, aimed at those who 
> contribute the most: the team that maintains Clojure itself. 
>
> People who are willing to invest their time to make and share useful tools 
> are a resource. They should be allowed to direct their energy toward 
> making 
> those tools better, rather than having it drained by jerky interactions. 
> Whether we find a project personally useful or not, we owe Open Source 
> authors, at a minimum, politeness. This is at least partially in our own 
> interest: we want them to keep making those tools, rather than burning out 
> and switching to a more rewarding activity. 
>
> Here's an article on framing feedback in a less confrontational and 
> accusatory manner. 
>
>   http://personalexcellence.co/blog/constructive-criticism/ 
>
> "Thanks for sharing Loom. There's a lot of information in the README, but 
> I found it difficult to figure out what the library actually does. It 
> would be helpful to have a concise, up-front description of its purpose." 
>
> Regards, 
> Paul 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to