On Saturday, December 5, 2015 at 5:45:22 PM UTC-6, James Reeves wrote: > > Why should they have any sort of naming scheme? Dynamic vars are unusual > because their values can change. Atoms and refs remain the same, and even > though inside their values mutate, they don't affect the outer var. >
Good point, James. They're just regular variables. Still, their role is very different from that of normal Clojure variables. I prefer to give them a different kind of name. But I can understand why others wouldn't. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
