On 21 November 2015 at 04:50, William la Forge <laforg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The reason for having this "type of object" at all is that I was going to > have 3 copies of the same code. Which I find to be a bad thing. >
Could you explain why you were going to have duplicate code, and how your object system solved this? All the examples you've provided are longer than they would be if they were written normally. - James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
