For what it's worth, here's the way that I always count lines of code, 
should work on any unix-like system:

find -name "*.clj" | wc -l

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 5:23:01 PM UTC-6, Colin Yates wrote:
>
> Exactly this. I couldn’t find a reliable way of counting LOC but my 
> (Clojure/ClojureSciprt) src tree (excluding test) in the project I have to 
> hand is 1.5MB.
>
>
> On 15 Nov 2015, at 21:27, Timothy Baldridge <tbald...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
> It's funny, because most of the larger OOP projects I worked on were large 
> because of class bloat, not because of business concerns. For example, the 
> C# app I used to work on was a more or less simple CRUD app. We had a ORM 
> that served up objects to a Silverlight UI. So if we wanted to display 
> information about a person on the UI we normally had to modify around 5 
> classes in 5 files. We had the following layers
>
> ORM - 1.4MB of generated C# for interfacing with the 200 or so SQL tables 
> we had
> DTO - Data Transfer Object, where used "normal" C# objects to abstract the 
> ORM. This is where we had the "Person" object 
> API - A web service that served up DTOs over HTTP
> Data Model - Processed views of DTOs formatted in a way that was easily 
> viewable by the UI
> View Model - UI classes that would take data from a Data Model and emit UI 
> controls. 
>
> All of that ceremony....that is replaced by one thing in Clojure...data. 
> Hashmaps and vectors replace all the junk you see above. 
>
> So that's where I often assert "Yes, you may have 1 million lines of Java 
> code....but that would only be ~10,000 lines of Clojure." With proper 
> application of data driven systems (data that configures pipelines and 
> writes code) you can easily get a 100:1 ratio of Java to Clojure code. 
>
> Timothy
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Marc O'Morain <ma...@circleci.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> We have a large app at CircleCI - as of September:
>>
>> "The repo for our main app contains 93,983 lines of Clojure code. The src 
>> directory 
>> of our main app contains 369 namespaces."
>>
>> http://blog.circleci.com/why-were-no-longer-using-core-typed/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 7:22 PM, dilettan...@live.com <javascript:> <
>> dilettan...@live.com <javascript:>> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been having a (friendly) argument with a friend who is an 
>>> old-school OOP programmer.  He insists that you need objects to make 
>>> large-scale codebases legible and maintainable over the long run.  Quite 
>>> apart from this argument's virtues or lack thereof, this made me curious -- 
>>> what are the largest programs written in Clojure in terms of LOC?  I know 
>>> I've seen mentions of 50k-100k LOC projects (World Singles, if I'm 
>>> remembering correctly), but are there any that are larger?
>>>
>>>    Vikram
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>>> <javascript:>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> --- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com 
>> <javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking 
> zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C 
> programs.”
> (Robert Firth) 
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to