Tom, would you be able to run your performance regression suite against 1.8 with direct linking enabled and share the performance changes?
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com> wrote: > With updates I have made in the latest release of Eastwood 0.2.2 > (announced in a separate message), I am seeing pretty much identical > linting results running Eastwood on about 80 Clojure contrib and 3rd party > libraries when using Clojure 1.8.0-RC1 as I see with Clojure 1.7.0. The > run time is nearly the same -- about 2% longer with 1.8.0-RC1, but I only > ran each set of tests once, and that could be within the range of > variability across runs. > > Andy > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Andy Fingerhut <andy.finger...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Results of some testing done on 1.8.0-RC1: >> >> Ran 'mvn clean test' on a few OS/JDK combos that are not tested as >> often. Reason: there have been (or still are) build or test failures with >> some of them. All JDKs listed below were 64-bit. >> >> Windows 7 Enterprise SP1 + Oracle JDK 1.7.0_80-b15: ok 3/3 trials >> Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS + OpenJDK 1.7.0_85: ok 3/3 trials >> Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS + IBM JDK 1.7.0: ok 10/10 trials, as long as failing >> tests mentioned in http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1678 are >> commented out >> Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS + IBM JDK 1.8.0 (based on jdk8u51-b15): same as for >> IBM JDK 1.7.0 >> Mac OS X 10.11.1 + Oracle JDK 1.8.0_11: ok 631/631 trials >> >> There were some JVM crashes during 'mvn test' that I have seen with an >> earlier version of IBM JDK 1.8.0 (based on jdk8u45-b13), but with the >> version mentioned above those seem to be gone. The older one failed 5 out >> of 10 trials. The newer one gave passing test results with no JVM crash 10 >> out of 10 trials. >> >> I plan to, but haven't yet, compared Eastwood results with 1.8.0-RC1 vs. >> 1.7.0. That will take some work before I can give those results, primarily >> updating Eastwood to work with 1.8.0-RC1. Eastwood makes some assumptions >> about the structure of ASTs (abstract syntax trees) that 1.8.0-RC!'s >> :rettag addition changed. I don't think it is much work, but not sure when >> I will be able to get to it. Until then, I have the following message near >> the beginning of Eastwood's README: >> >> It has been tried with some of the Clojure 1.8.0-alpha versions, but >> there are known problems there (e.g. incorrect warning about misplaced >> docstrings, perhaps incorrect warnings about wrong tags, etc.) >> >> Andy >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> wrote: >> >>> Clojure 1.8.0-RC1 is now available. *This build is a "release >>> candidate"!* We would appreciate any and all testing you can do on your >>> own libraries or internal projects to find problems. If no problems are >>> found, we expect to make this the 1.8.0 final release! >>> >>> Try it via >>> >>> - Download: >>> https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.8.0-RC1 >>> - Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.8.0-RC1"] >>> >>> Below is the only change since 1.8.0-beta2. See the full 1.8 change log >>> here: https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/changes.md. >>> >>> - CLJ-1845 <http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1845> Make >>> clojure.core/load dynamic so it can be redef'ed even with direct linking >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
