For future travelers.
If you use figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT you will get this exception:
clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: java.lang.RuntimeException: No such
var: ana/forms-seq*, compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:49:21)
figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT has a dependency on cljs 1.7.145 even though it needs
1.7.170.
To resolve this error you must explicitly depend on clojurescript in your
plugins. Example:
:plugins [[lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]] ;; Overrides broken
lein-figwheel dependency.
lein deps :tree shows cljs 1.7.170 is used.
So,
On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 3:30:05 AM UTC-6, Maria Geller wrote:
> Try using 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT for figwheel ;)
>
> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 9:59:24 PM UTC+13, Francis Avila wrote:I'm
> getting the following exception with figwheel builds (using 0.4.1):
>
>
>
> java.lang.AbstractMethodError: Method
> clojurescript_build/core/CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
> is abstract
>
> at clojurescript_build.core.CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources (core.clj:-1)
>
>
>
>
>
> (cljsbuild works fine with version 1.1.1)
>
>
>
> Nolan said "All the mentioned tools [inc. figwheel] have already accounted
> for this change." I don't see any mention in the figwheel docs about cljs
> 1.7.170 compatibility or any commit message that mentions it. Can anyone
> confirm this is actually true for figwheel?
>
>
>
> On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
>
> > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Leiningen dependency information:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > This release includes a major refactor of the build pipeline thanks to
>
> > Juho Teperi. This change along with some greatly simplified
>
> > recompilation logic will mean much faster cold build times for larger
>
> > projects (some users have already reported >10X).
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > This is a breaking change for existing tooling. You will need to
>
> > upgrade lein-cljsbuild, lein-figwheel, and boot-cljs if you intend to
>
> > adopt this version of ClojureScript. All the mentioned tools have
>
> > already accounted for this change. Refer to the appropriate
>
> > documentation for your tooling to determine which version number you
>
> > should adopt.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Other interesting changes and fixes include newer Google Closure
>
> > Compiler and Library dependencies, self hosting tweaks, a Google
>
> > Closure modules (:modules compiler option) regression,
>
> > improved warnings, and minor REPL enhancements.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > As always feedback welcome!
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ### Enhancements
>
> > * Refactor build pipeline
>
> > * CLJS-1478: Self-host: Allow static-fns opt
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ### Changes
>
> > * Generate larger range of random UUIDs
>
> > * make browser REPL file reloads less chatty
>
> > * CLJS-1475: indicate that cljs.reader/read is safe
>
> > * CLJS-1470: Bump GCL Dependency
>
> > * bump Google Closure dep
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ### Fixes
>
> > * in system-time check that js/process.hrtime is actually a thing
>
> > * CLJS-1228: cljs.util/topo-sort is polynomial on larger dependency graphs
>
> > * check that performance.now method actually exists
>
> > * CLJS-1476: Self-host: Protocol prefixing broken for three- (or more)
> > segment namespaces
>
> > * CLJS-1472 Patch for CLJS-1467 causes regression for nodejscli
>
> > * CLJS-1469 :modules regression
>
> > * CLJS-1445: Syntax error for var args in protocol methods
>
> > * Warn if protocol impl methods do not match its protocol
>
> > * CLJS-1451 Protocol impl do not support qualified method names
>
> > * CLJS-1422: cljs.js/eval-str fails for ns form on node.js with simple
> > optimizations
>
> > * CLJS-1423: self-host: Requiring analyzer/compiler breaks unchecked Boolean
>
> > * CLJS-1466: Improperly munged output path for GClosure JavaScript
>
> > * CLJS-1467: Foreign Libraries not included when using :main with :simple
> > or :advanced
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
