On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:40 PM, Nick Pavlica <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not currently planning on 1-2 million connections on a single server > at the moment. I really wish I had those problems, but I would like to > count on being able to achieve 100-200K on a single reasonably sized > server. Even if I could achieve 1-2 million connections on a server, I'm > not sure it's the best idea to do so. It seems like allot of coupling of > the service to a single endpoint. I sounds like Elxir/Erlang+x, or > possibly Go, may be better at handling the concurrency components of my app > until the JVM ships with a GC that's better suited to this kind of work. I > know that they are going to ship a new GC in 1.9, but I don't know if it > will help out. > Whether GC is going to be a problem for you for other reasons, your post contained a link to a benchmark which surpassed the number you quoted by an order of magnitude - 600,000. Disregarding whether http-kit is a sensible/safe library choice, its benchmark is readily understandable. The github webserver benchmarks also contain many numbers above 200,000 qps, for a variety of other webservers - right? http://www.http-kit.org/600k-concurrent-connection-http-kit.html I don't think the problem exists as you're describing it. Take care, Moe -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
