Artur Malabarba <arturmalaba...@gmail.com> writes: >> > Yes, that's what the current (but unmerged) implementation does. :) > >> If this cache were persisted between Emacs sessions then the problem >> largely goes away. >> > Yes, that's very plausible to do.
I am happy to do the implementation for this (i.e. the persistance!), given that I am raising the problem, if that would be a help. Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.