I totally agree. I will keep this library in the back of my head! On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 12:52:46 AM UTC+2, Matching Socks wrote: > > The Readme is excellent and illuminates some of the depth behind the brief > example that opened this thread. If it is possible for depth to be > behind. In this case I believe it is. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
