Protocol callsites are already optimized in clojure.
Here's the emitted bytecode for a protocol invocation:

         0: aload_0
         1: aconst_null
         2: astore_0
         3: dup
         4: invokestatic  #36                 // Method 
clojure/lang/Util.classOf:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Class;
         7: getstatic     #38                 // Field 
__cached_class__0:Ljava/lang/Class;
        10: if_acmpeq     27
        13: dup
        14: instanceof    #40                 // class test/p
        17: ifne          42
        20: dup
        21: invokestatic  #36                 // Method 
clojure/lang/Util.classOf:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Class;
        24: putstatic     #38                 // Field 
__cached_class__0:Ljava/lang/Class;
        27: getstatic     #23                 // Field 
const__0:Lclojure/lang/Var;
        30: invokevirtual #44                 // Method 
clojure/lang/Var.getRawRoot:()Ljava/lang/Object;
        33: swap
        34: invokeinterface #49,  2           // InterfaceMethod 
clojure/lang/IFn.invoke:(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
        39: goto          47
        42: invokeinterface #51,  1           // InterfaceMethod 
test/p.f:()Ljava/lang/Object;
        47: areturn

Ignoring the class cache, as you can see there's an instanceof check
at offset 14 which results in a direct interface method invocation (at
offset 42) if the type of the target implements directly the interface
which backs the protocol, which is always the case when a deftype
implements a protocol inline rather than via extend.

Nathan Marz writes:

> My understanding is that invocation of protocol methods incurs about 30%
> overhead due to the need to look up the appropriate function for the type.
> I also learned recently that Clojure does not use static type information
> to do the lookup at compile-time and avoid the overhead. Given that Clojure
> already does do some type analysis (to optimize Java method invocations),
> why not do it for protocol invocation as well? Just trying to further my
> understanding of the Clojure compiler.

--

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to