Often compatibility comes at the cost of functionality and maintainability, so in the end of the day someone has to pay the piper. Why would anyone be using Emacs 23? It's easy to upgrade it pretty much everywhere and I doubt anyone is doing much programming on their RHEL 5/6 production servers.
On 20 June 2015 at 18:24, Matching Socks <phill.w...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hooray for compatibility in general. Let us always remember the less > fortunate. (Ehem - users of Emacs 23 for example.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
