It is difficult to say exactly, since the documentation is almost non-existent, which is especially bad for a standard API. Please see my answer to Christopher for more elaboration.
On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 10:45:53 PM UTC+2, Matt Revelle wrote: > > On Friday, June 19, 2015 at 4:57:32 AM UTC-4, Dragan Djuric wrote: >> >> I do not even claim that an unified api is not possible. I think that to >> some extent it is. I just doubt in core.matrix eligibility for THE api in >> numerical computing. For it makes easy things easy and hard things >> impossible. > > > Are you saying you don't believe core.matrix should be _the_ abstract API > for matrices/arrays in Clojure? If so, what are your concerns? Feel free to > point to me a previous post if it's already been stated. It also sounds > like you're alluding to the thread in the Numerical Clojure group about a > broad "numerical computing lib" for complex numbers and various math > functions, but I'm not following how that matters here. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
