Oh, yes, and that's an interesting idea to wrap a record in an atom or delay. For my present uses that would be more trouble than it's worth, but it's something worth keeping in mind for other situations.
On Friday, June 12, 2015 at 10:41:57 AM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: > > puzzler, thanks for the explanation about how you built on potemkin's map > options. Probably not useful for my current application--easier to just > work around deftype's limitations on an ad-hoc basis. But that takes some > of the fun (convenience) out of Clojure (and unnecessarily, I feel, I > guess). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
