We could, but the benefits do not seem worth the effort to me. On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 12:33:41 AM UTC-5, Jakub Holy wrote: > > Thank you, Alex. I understand and agree with the importance of publishing > to Maven Central but my question is why can't we publish *also* to Clojars? > > -- > Forget software. Strive to make an impact, deliver a valuable change. > > (Vær så snill og hjelp meg med å forbedre norsken min – skriftlig og > muntlig. Takk!) > > Jakub Holy > Solutions Engineer | +47 966 23 666 > Iterate AS | www.iterate.no > The Lean Software Development Consultancy > - http://theholyjava.wordpress.com/ - > 11. mai 2015 07:19 skrev "Alex Miller" <al...@puredanger.com <javascript:> > >: > >> As usual, the answer is a combination of technical goals intertwined with >> history. Stuart Sierra is probably the one with the most knowledge of the >> history - it predates my involvement with Clojure in a deep way. Best link >> I see is: http://dev.clojure.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=950842. In >> summary, it was of primary importance to be available to the broader Java >> ecosystem and Maven central was already blessed and understood by that >> audience. >> >> This is also from a time when builds based on Maven, Ant, Gradle, etc >> were more common than the relatively new and less-featured Leiningen. Those >> tools already understood Maven Central but had to be configured to use >> Clojars. I'm unsure of the exact timeline, but I'm pretty sure Clojars >> predated Leiningen by a year or two. >> >> On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 5:43:47 AM UTC-5, Jakub Holy wrote: >>> >>> This is essentially a question to Cognitect / developers of >>> the clojure/* libraries but I do not know of a better communication channel >>> than this one. >>> >>> To me, clojars is the one place to go to find out what libraries are >>> there and especially what is the latest version. It always surprises me >>> that some core libraries such as .e.g clojure.data.cvs aren't there. It is >>> annoying and difficult to remember that I have to search both clojars and >>> Maven Central. I think it would be really wonderful if these libraries too >>> could be on clojars. Or is there any reason why this cannot be the case? >>> >>> (I know there are sites for finding libraries such as Clojure Toolbox >>> but that is not really what I am asking for here.) >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Best regards, Jakub Holy >>> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:> >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the >> Google Groups "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/kGwmWLRAUNo/unsubscribe. >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
