I think 'some' fills this role. Given truthy values, why do you need to use boolean with it?
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 8:32:09 PM UTC-5, Colin Taylor wrote: > > Any reason why we don't have `any?`. Googled without much luck. > Trivially done as `comp boolean some` not doubt, but I know I use it more > than not-any at least. > It's particularly useful as a composable `or`. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
