This thread over Silk, Bidi and Secretary has been very interesting. I looked at the three projects to see how they evolved after this thread started. Any cross-pollination or progress worth sharing now that I've missed?
>From what I could gather: * Secretary is evolving towards a conservative 2.0 and won't, after all, be re-implemented on top of Silk. This may be a good thing: not bringing more transitive dependencies in all projects using Secretary. Thus, Secretary would remain the first stop for Compojure-like easy routing in ClojureScript apps. * Bidi was already quite mature and comparable to Silk and remains as attractive as it was, especially with regard to its established production usage and corporate backing. * Silk's development slowed for some time and this may make for a good occasion to reflect on its state and the value of its ambitions (which seemed quite interesting to me). * I would add, from distant memory, that Pedestal's isomorphic routing is planned to be extracted into a self-contained library. Judging from the advent of Clojure 1.7's reader conditionals and Om's model 2 for which I'm expecting an announcement in a few weeks, I suppose Cognitect may start providing again their leadership on the front-end. Either they start recommending something like Bidi or Silk, or they (more probably) reader-cond-port their routing lib to ClojureScript. I'm watching this space and thanks for any comments. On Sunday, October 12, 2014 at 11:28:13 PM UTC-4, Dom Kiva-Meyer wrote: > Thanks for the experience reports, Dylan! > > > Colin, Silk is Ring-compatible and meant to be used as a single replacement > for both Compojure and Secretary (or any other server/browser routing > combination with incompatible syntax and semantics). But, as Dylan said, it's > totally fine to use it in conjunction with Compojure instead of replacement. > Silk should also work fine with all Ring middleware. > In the next version, Silk will have a more familiar and mostly > Compojure-compatible syntax for defining routes. My hope is that this will > make it easier to translate Compojure examples/code to Silk. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
