On Mar 31, 2015, at 3:57 PM, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com> wrote: > From my perspective, Instaparse is reaching pretty far into the guts there. > I'll talk to Rich about it though.
Thanks. I know we've had several discussions about what should be considered "API" around some of the Java code that implements Clojure and it struck me as odd that these pieces were clearly designed to be called from Clojure yet otherwise seemed to be "internal" so I'd definitely be curious as to the thinking there. Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ dev.Objective() - Developing Apps, Developing Skills, Developing Community -- May 12-15, 2015 - Bloomington, MN - http://devobjective.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
