It turns out that this code works in Clojure: (let [x (clojure.lang.Box. 1)] (set! (.val x) 2) (.val x))
while this one failed to compile in Clojurescript (just .cljs, no macro involved): (let [x (cljs.core/Box. 1)] (set! (.val x) 2) (.val x)) Box is already defined as mutable in Clojurescript https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/src/cljs/cljs/core.cljs#L5891 Why is Clojurescript so aggressive? Or is it a bug? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
