Lief you have a really valid point here. I was definitely aware that there are only about a dozen actual masks that get used, so I had been looking for a good way to unroll that computation. So, you definitely have showed me something useful with your macro approach. I think doing that though is something I will want to revisit a little bit down the line -- ldb and dpb Have proven themselves useful enough to try to first look at ways to optimize them for the "general use" case. The .countTrailingZeros code seems to take a much more efficient approach to "mask-offset" and IIRC may completely eliminate "mask-width". I'm going to play with it today and I'll report back any interesting results.
This group is really a fantastic resource. You guys are awesome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
