Thanks for your comments. I see now that I should clarify: all I really need is public access to the left and right Java methods in PTM. (So, perhaps CLJ-1008 is asking for more than I really need.)
It seems to me that since Clojure's RB-Tree implementation (i.e. sorted-map = PTM), it might as well expose a Java API for root node (which it does) and branches (which is does not, currently). Is there any downside to exposing the 'right' and 'left' Java methods as public? In the near term, I'll be using data.avl. I'm glad it exists! My use case involves a non-overlapping interval map to store time series data that doesn't change very often. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
