2015-02-18 17:52 GMT+01:00 James Reeves <ja...@booleanknot.com>: > It occurs to me that you could use a macro to fake this: > > (N 1,000,000,000) > > (defmacro N [& parts] > (apply + (map * (reverse parts) (iterate (partial * 1000) 1)))) > > But I wouldn't recommend it :) >
I will not do that then. ;-) > You could also just use exponents: 1e9 means the same thing as 1000000000. > I already did that. But I like the solution of Gary even better (* 1000 1000 1000). But that is not a solution for a number like 2.911.054, there I should use 2.911054E6. > On 18 February 2015 at 15:33, Akos Gyimesi <a...@gyim.hu> wrote: > >> It is not possible in Clojure. This is the full regexp pattern for >> integers: >> >> https://github.com/clojure/clojure/blob/master/src/jvm/clojure/lang/LispReader.java#L67 >> On 18 Feb 2015, at 08:07, Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> In Java I can use: >> 1_000_000_000 >> >> This makes code a lot more readable. But it seems this is not possible in >> Clojure. Am I overlooking something? >> >> -- Cecil Westerhof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
