Thanks for the tip,  I had used lein-ancient in the past and it seems
to have come along a bit since then.

How is it that you have this configured?

Do you run lein ancient upgrade before each build that you want to
check its dependencies?  I tried this locally and I can't find a way
to tell lein ancient to only try and upgrade certain libraries, rather
than all or nothing.

For example I have a dependency on incanter 1.5.5 - I don't want it to
upgrade to 1.9.0 because it will break the build catastrophically just
now...  I do however want to whitelist it to my library, which I'm
expecting to keep more current.

R.

On 17 February 2015 at 19:14, Michael Blume <blume.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Related -- we run lein ancient as part of a lot of our builds so that we can
> easily pick up dependencies with newer available versions.
>
> On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 11:13:44 AM Michael Blume <blume.m...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> What we do at Climate is avoid SNAPSHOT builds. Every build gets a version
>> string with timestamp and git commit. If an upstream library is changed,
>> it's up to downstream maintainers to update their dependency on it. If you
>> update a dependency and your build fails, you a) don't update your
>> dependency just yet b) complain to the library maintainer that their new
>> version breaks your project.
>>
>> On Tue Feb 17 2015 at 9:51:18 AM Rick Moynihan <rick.moyni...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> At work, we use Jenkins to continuously integrate our Clojure projects
>>> which are factored into both applications and a small number of
>>> supporting libraries; all of which use Leiningen as their project
>>> build tool.
>>>
>>> Leiningen builds each project, and runs its tests; and then if they
>>> pass it lein installs the project jar into the local ~/.m2 repo and
>>> triggers any dependent builds to start.  The dependencies then start
>>> building and pick up the latest SNAPSHOT build from the ~/.m2
>>> directory.
>>>
>>> This works ok; but it has a relatively major flaw, which is that just
>>> because a project passes its local tests; it doesn't mean that it
>>> hasn't broken an upstream library.  When this happens the broken
>>> library is left in the shared ~/.m2 directory - breaking other builds
>>> and generally lying around causing havoc.
>>>
>>> Fortunately this rarely happens in practice; but it is a potential
>>> cause of hard to diagnose (unrepeatable build) problems - especially
>>> when using snapshot builds - which is what I think we want to use for
>>> tracking branches until we
>>>
>>> We currently use the Jenkins leiningen plugin, but I don't think it
>>> supports a more sophisticated setup than this.
>>>
>>> I was wondering if anyone with experience of running robust CI builds
>>> (with Jenkins) might have any ideas about to solve this in a more
>>> robust manner??
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>> Rick
>>> --
>>> http://twitter.com/RickMoynihan
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "Clojure" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to