On Friday, February 13, 2015 at 12:05:24 AM UTC-5, Justin Smith wrote: > > it's an infinite lazy sequence with itself as a dependency. The first n > elements see a value of the initial non-lazy prefix. The alternative would > be a compilation error.
Nope. Every component of the sequence should be a cell with a first value and a delay of the rest, or in the chunked case a cell with 32 values and a delay of the rest. The delay may or may not have already been forced. But under no circumstances should it see a sequence endpoint that never actually exists. And if something goes wrong it should be a runtime error, specifically, if computing element N requires going farther than element N-1 the computation of some delay should end up trying to force the same delay, which would hang ... at runtime. Similar to @(promise). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
