Hi, James. I'll let people with more experience with components critique your solution, but one thing that I thought was weird was that you had auto-namespaced keywords in the config file. I'm referring to: https://github.com/james-henderson/phoenix#adding-dependencies-between-components
That means only code in your blessed ns can read the file, or things break. Also, the edn spec disallows keywords beginning with "::". So, I'd suggest either following the edn spec or using the ".clj" ending for the config files. --Leif On Saturday, January 24, 2015 at 10:20:10 AM UTC-5, James Henderson wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've just released Phoenix - a library for declarative configuration and > wiring of Component-based systems. Phoenix came out of a number of > discussions at ClojureX, thank you to all involved for their suggestions > and feedback :) > > https://github.com/james-henderson/phoenix > > If you’ve written a traditional Component-based system, you’ve probably > experienced having to create and maintain a plethora of ‘system.clj’, > ‘dev.clj’, ‘user.clj’ etc type namespaces in order to wire-up the system, > set up configuration-based switches, and duplicate the code to > start/stop/reload the system. Phoenix removes the need for all of this, > replacing it with one (or more, if you choose) EDN declaration of how your > system should be wired up. It should also compose well with any other > Components you (or anyone else) may have already written. > > For a sample project, you can run 'lein new phoenix-webapp <your-project>', > then 'cd <your-project>' and 'lein dev'. Once the nREPL is up, running ' > (phoenix/reload!)' will stop the system, reload any namespaces, and > restart the system. > > Phoenix is just one possible way of wiring up such a system - I understand > that there are a fair few ideas floating around out there at the moment! > I'd be really interested to hear your thoughts - whether it be 'this is > mostly right, but I wouldn't do that part like that', or 'you've gone about > this completely the wrong way, because ...' - let me know! > > Cheers, > > James > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
