Those are some very comprehensive responses indeed; thanks Michael. It makes sense now. I'll keep an eye on lein-ring and clojure upgrades and in the mean time work around it.
Ghadi, you are of course right; thanks. I was playing around with extend so two types could share an implementation without adding glue. Direct implementation is probably more efficient, glue notwithstanding. And it doesn't run into CLJ-979 :) On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:20:17 UTC, Michael Blume wrote: > > On further investigation, it looks like you're suffering from > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-979 -- if I apply the patch for > this bug to clojure and recompile your project everything works fine. It > looks like this patch *is* slated to make it into Clojure 1.7.0, so that > should also make your problem go away. > >> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
