I've tried that already but then Clojure complains about there being an uneven number of elements in a map.
Curious though: did the original code ever actually work? Is it something that was deprecated? Have to say I am happy if that's the case, the original seemed unnecessarily arcane where as a standard function call is obvious. On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 11:42:10 PM UTC, Ryan Neufeld wrote: > Yeah, we shouldn't be telling you to use reader literals like that. > Preferred is a call to (d/tempid ...). I'm updating the code now ( > https://github.com/clojure-cookbook/clojure-cookbook/blob/master/06_databases/6-11_schema.asciidoc > ) > > On Tuesday, December 16, 2014 2:01:00 PM UTC-6, edw...@kenworthy.info > wrote: >> >> I'm following the Clojure Cookbook recipe for defining a schema in >> datomic. >> >> One of the forms is: #db/id[:db.part/db] but this generates an exception >> "clojure.lang.ExceptionInfo: >> No reader function for tag id :: {:column 25, :line 27, :type >> :reader-exception}" >> >> Can anyone offer any insight? >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
