Cool. I haven't used core.async before, and am a bit reluctant to pull in another dependency just for this. But maybe it's the right solution.
On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:03:54 AM UTC-8, Erik Price wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Brian Craft <craft...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> It does seem like a single-thread solution would be better, not creating >> so many futures. Polling seems pretty crude, but I don't see another way of >> doing it with clojure abstractions. Maybe a pure java solution. >> > > FWIW, the core.async-based solution satisfies both the criteria of being > single-threaded and non-polling. > > e > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
