Is there a way to provide a default (fallback) implementation for a method defined in a defprotocol directive? I do realize that I could extend the protocol for type java.lang.Object, but this raises the question about how protocol implementations with extend are sorted, i.e. how specializations of types of the same hierarchy are resolved. Is the most specialized implementation used if I implement a protocol for a class as well as its parent class and if yes, is this independent of the order of definition for the protocol extensions?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
