(def map-entry (first {1 2}))
(empty map-entry)
=> nil
Up until now my understanding was that map entries are completely
interchangeable with vectors, in that you can conj and assoc just like
vectors, and you can even call them like functions. I figured that calling
empty on a map entry would return an empty vector. Does this seem like a
reasonable functionality demand, or can someone shed some light on why this
is the current behavior?
Thanks!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
