Congrats on publishing the tool! Just to clarify - this isn't quite a parallel test runner. You're just testing the namespaces in parallel.
Consider the case where you have 5 namespaces, 4 of which have a single test in them, and one of which has 100 tests in it. Assume all tests have two assertions. In this scenario, your test suite will actually run faster in a standard, serial test run, than in the parallel (by namespace) test run. Feel free to benchmark your testing tool against Pedestal's test suite - it's a good mix of different size testing namespaces. Cheers, Paul On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:00:57 PM UTC-4, Jake Pearson wrote: > > Hi, > I got to spend some hack days and created a parallel test runner for > clojure.test. It is part of an autotester I wrote a couple of years ago > called quickie. To run your tests add [quickie "0.3.5"] to your :plugins. > Then run lein quickp. Stacktraces get filtered. The return code is equal to > the number of failed tests, so a return code of 0 is a passing test run. > > If you use with-redefs, you will probably want to switch over to the > with-local-redefs function from the gist below: > > https://gist.github.com/gfredericks/7143494 > > https://github.com/jakepearson/quickie > > Enjoy, > Jake > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
