Yes when I write block I meant park. My first idea was to use a control channel which have pause and resume input but then my question is <! control-channel would park until a value is available, what if I want to continue is there is nothing ?
On Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:39:51 PM UTC+2, Alex Miller wrote: > > You should never block a go loop other than by using a parking channel op > (like <!, >!, etc). > > You probably instead want a control channel where you can send it a pause > message telling it to block on the control channel until a resume message > arrives. > > On Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:52:48 AM UTC-5, Jeremy Vuillermet wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> here is my use case >> >> (defn replay [history] (go (doseq [millis history] >> (<! (timeout millis)) >> (prn millis)))) >> >> history is a vector of duration: [1000 2000 4000] >> >> Now I would like to pause this doseq. One way is to use an atom pause?, >> check for the pause and block until a new value in a "resume" chan. >> >> But there may be an other way with channels only and avoid global/shared >> pause atom. >> I was naively thinking of a pause channel and at each loop I check if >> there is a value but I'm not sure it's better and I couldn't manage to do >> it anyway. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
