On 10 September 2014 at 15:42:01, j...@afandian.com (j...@afandian.com) wrote: > Is this the right way to do this?
Yes. > Could I somehow make this implicit > and avoid re-writing the DateTimeProtocol implementations? There's no way around implementing the DateTimeProtocol functions you need for your data structure but you can make some of your function delegate to the original clj-time ones (e.g. by instantiating a DateTime or another class and passing them on to clj-time). -- @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
