I highly recommend this talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzP05hEDNvs The title is mostly about persistent data structures, but in reality the talk serves as an excellent intro to clojure.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2014-08-23 7:06 GMT+02:00 Mars0i <marsh...@logical.net>: > > (1) Others may disagree, but ... although I love Lisps, think that purely >> functional programming is cool, and have come to see that there are >> situations in which FP is *great*, I am not someone who thinks that FP >> is always clearer (easier to understand) or as clear as imperative >> programming. For some jobs, one can be be made clearer than the other. >> Maybe, in addition to providing examples in which FP is clearer, you would >> want to provide an example in which it's less clear. Since so many people >> go around promoting the latest, greatest thing that will solve all of your >> programming problems, it might build trust to show that you understand that >> there are tradeoffs. >> > > Can you share which things you find less clear? > > > > >> >> (2) The REPL. Show how easy it is to stop your program and inspect data >> structures, or to try out a new function with different arguments, or to >> chain some functions together in an experimental way. >> > > I love that. (Also in Scala.) > > > > >> (3) pmap. I had a program that was mapping a function over a sequence of >> data structures to produce the next sequence of data structures. Then I >> added "p" to two instances of "map", and got a 2-4X speedup. It would have >> been more if I'd had more cores. Then I rearranged the code a little bit >> so that I only needed one map or pmap call, and got a little more speed. >> Occasionally, during debugging, I replace pmap with map so that I can see >> the sequence. Easy peasy. Multiprocessing in Clojure isn't always that >> easy, but I'd guess that it's it's never that easy in other popular >> languages. >> > > I have to delve into that. Interesting. > > > > >> (5) Which reminds me: Going back to point (1) about building trust, maybe >> it's worth mentioning that you will need side effects some time, and >> Clojure is going to make you mix it with laziness simply because so many of >> the useful functions generate lazy sequences. This can be a pain, and >> *will* generate annoying bugs, at least at first. But as with any >> programming style, you have to develop good practices in order to avoid >> gotchas. >> > > Sadly I fell more as once in the error of not taking into account that > certain things are lazy. :'-( > > > Thanks. New things to think about. :-D > > > -- > Cecil Westerhof > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.” (Robert Firth) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.