On Thu Aug 14 19:04 2014, dgrnbrg wrote:
> You're all right--that was a cut & paste error. I meant that I see this 
> behavior with alt!!, not alts!

With alt!!, it should probably be something like:

(let [result (alt!! [[inner-chan e]] ([v] (if v
                                            :put-a-value
                                            :channel-closed))
                    :default :failed-to-put
                    :priority true)]
  (println result))

I hope this helps.

Sincerely,

Daniel

> 
> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 3:31:45 PM UTC-4, Ghadi Shayban wrote:
> >
> > What Daniel said.  The call is incorrect, its args are alt-shaped, but it 
> > calls alt*s*.
> >
> > alt is the macro that is shaped like cond.
> > alts is the function that takes a vector
> >
> > Both take splatted options at the end.
> >
> > Can never use single bang* except within go.*
> >
> > go => !
> > thread => !!
> >
> > Unfortunately if the two are confused, the exception will happen... 
> > probably elsewhere.
> >
> > On Thursday, August 14, 2014 2:46:22 PM UTC-4, Eric Normand wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi there,
> >>
> >> The :default option is for a *value* that should be returned if none of 
> >> the channels are available. The expression is evaluated *before* the 
> >> async/alts! call happens (just like normal parameters).
> >>
> >> I think you are misunderstanding alts!. It should be used like this
> >>
> >> (let [[val ch] (async/alts! [[inner-chan e]] :default :default)]
> >>   (if (= :default val)
> >>     (println "inner-chan was not ready")
> >>     (if val
> >>       (println "did the put to inner-chan")
> >>       (println "inner-chan is closed"))))
> >>
> >> I hope that helps. Let me know if you have any more questions.
> >>
> >> Eric
> >>
> >> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 11:03:01 AM UTC-5, dgrnbrg wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When I use alts!, it seems that both the put and :default action run 
> >>> every time. I've included the code sample below:
> >>>
> >>> (let [inner-chan (async/chan (async/buffer 1000))
> >>>       mult (async/mult inner-chan)
> >>>   (async/thread
> >>>     (while true
> >>>       (let [e (.take linked-blocking-queue)]
> >>>         (async/alts!
> >>>           [[inner-chan e]] (println "did the put")
> >>>           :default (println "failed to put")
> >>>           :priority true)))))
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Elsewhere in the code, I tap the mult before I start putting elements 
> >>> onto the linked-blocking-queue. For every element I put onto the LBQ, I 
> >>> see 
> >>> both messages: "did the put" and "failed to put". What is going on here?
> >>>
> >>
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to