2014-07-09 10:38 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com>:
> 2014-07-09 9:39 GMT+02:00 Cecil Westerhof <cldwester...@gmail.com>:
>
> Or you could use a definition of look more like this, which uses println
>>
>>> to print each item on its own line (not sure if you wanted to retain the
>>> parens or not, but both are easily doable).
>>>
>>> (defn look []
>>> (doseq [d [(describe-location *location* nodes)
>>> (describe-paths *location* edges)
>>> (describe-objects *location* objects
>>> *object-locations*)]]
>>> (println d)))
>>>
>>
>> That certainly looks better. The only problem is that the lines of the
>> different calls are still printed as one. But rewriting to use strings
>> would solve that problem. I just have to finish the book, to see if I can
>> change the lists to strings.
>>
>>
>
> Solved it without reverting to stings. See attachment. The only 'problem'
> are the parentheses. How to get rid of those?
>
Solved that one also:
(defn look []
(doseq [d (concat (describe-location @location nodes)
(describe-paths @location edges)
(describe-objects @location objects object-locations))]
(apply println d)))
--
Cecil Westerhof
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
