Hi Pascal,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Pascal Germroth <funkyco...@gmail.com> wrote: > I tried replacing a closure with a dynamically built and evaluated > metafunction but discovered that it was actually slower. > If evaluating code during run is slower than AOT compiling it, it wouldn't surprise me. > I guess f2 runs this much slower than f1 because it doesn't actually pass > a reference to x when unquoting, but clones the value, which means it needs > to compare the lists element-wise. > > This is interesting. Were you able to confirm it or are you just guessing? (I'm just curious.) -- Kind Regards, Atamert Ölçgen -+- --+ +++ www.muhuk.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
