Fair enough. Fortunately, Clojure provides so many different tools to select from in creating you perfect recipe. ;-)
I'm glad to hear that reducers ultimately provided you with some benefits over your previous concurrency approach. The one thing that seems rather odd to me though is that your group-size is 1. I'm presuming that the function you're r/mapping must take a substantial amount of time and resources for that to be efficient. Have you experimented with larger group sizes to avoid too much thread swapping? ~Gary -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
