Yeah maybe, but both b and B should basically be billed at max of their associated dates, which might affect the things that depend on B. So I don't think b can be dropped completely.
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 11:30:35 PM UTC+2, David Pidcock wrote: > > If, say C cannot depend on any b directly, (I.e. C can only depend on B), > and your domain rules say you can only bill for all b's when you bill B, > then really you have a self contained sub-graph with only one bill date for > the root node B. > You can simply ignore backfilling the billing date for b's and just bundle > them into the bill for B when you generate it. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
